Equalisation Levy

18th July – Equalisation Levy

A long-battle ahead on equalisation levy

The battle-lines are once again drawn between the government and multinational companies over their tax liability in India. What’s different this time is that the dispute involves non-resident e-commerce operators such as Amazon, Netflix and Flipkart over the equalisation levy.

What is the concern?

The genesis of this quarrel is the long-standing ire of governments globally about foreign companies not paying tax in a country despite deriving revenue and profits from their businesses in that country. This ‘profit shifting’, from one country to another, has been a part of the tax planning of MNCs, involving a web of subsidiaries, many in low-tax jurisdictions. In the case of digital companies, where tangible physical presence may be hard to establish, the problems of the Taxman are only compounded.

Background –

  • The OECD has been working with over 137 countries to bring about a consensus on fighting this tax avoidance. The equalisation levy was one of the suggestions in OECD’s BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) Action Plan 1 and India adopted this, though in a narrow manner, in 2016. But in the Finance Act 2020, the Centre has expanded the scope of this levy significantly.
  • With the Indian e-commerce segment expected to grow to $200 billion by 2026, it is not surprising that the Centre does not want to forego the revenue that these players can pay the exchequer.

Equalisation levy in India –

  • It was in 2016 that the equalisation levy of 6 per cent was first introduced on payment for online advertisements made to non-residents.
  • In the Finance Act 2020, the scope of equalisation levy was expanded to include e-commerce supply of goods or services. These transactions were to be taxed at 2 per cent if the business earned over ₹2 crore in a financial year.
  • This provision had found no mention in Budget 2020. Operators are also crying hoarse over the fact that the tax is effective from April 1, 2020, and the first quarterly payment fell due on July 7.

Concerns raised –

There are a few concerns that are being raised by companies and legal experts that the Centre could try to address.

  • The primary issue is that the income on which the equalisation levy is charged is exempt from Indian income tax. So credit for the tax is not available against any income arising in India. The ability to deduct this levy from the income in the country of residence will depend on the laws in that country, and may not be always possible.
  • Further, it has not been specified that the levy is on the income earned by the e-commerce operator, it is stated to be on the consideration received by the operator. Therefore, claiming a credit for the levy against the income in the country of residence many prove a problem with most bi-lateral tax treaties covering only tax on income.
  • The wider definition of E-commerce operator’ — as an entity that owns, operates or manages a digital or electronic facility or platform for online sales of goods or online provision of services, or both — can bring many other digital platforms inadvertently into the ambit of Indian tax law. The revenue can be more specific about the kinds of digital services that are now taxable.
  • The levy also appears to be covering transactions between two non-residents when one of them has used an Indian IP address to transact. There could be operational difficulties in implementing this.

Way forward –

  • A way out could be to wait it out for the OECD to finalise its rules regarding this issue. While this could lead to further delay, at least the solution will be part of a global consensus and may be more acceptable to the operators. A multilateral solution based on the work of the 137 members of the Inclusive Framework at the OECD is clearly the best way forward.
  • The OECD’s discussion paper, released towards the end of 2019, had discussed a three-tier approach to taxing digital players:
  1. Dividing the MNCs profits after accounting for expenditure between the countries it operates in, based on a formula linked to sales. The amount of tax will be agreed upon based on consensus.
  2. In regions where the e-commerce operator acts as a distributor, taxability will be based on existing rules of transfer pricing.
  3. Effective dispute resolution mechanisms should also be put in place to settle the litigations.

Conclusion –

It is clear that all countries are working towards getting their due revenue in the digital economy. India has to decide whether it wants to battle alone or join others to make the objective easier to achieve.

SourceThe Hindu Business Line

QUESTION – What is an ‘equalisation levy’? What are the concerns raised towards it? Suggest a way forward for India to ensure a smooth passage on this road in the era of globalisation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *