Regarding the debate on convicted persons contesting elections in India, consider the following statements:
- The Representation of the People Act, 1951 allows convicted persons to contest elections if they appeal within three months of conviction.
- The Election Commission of India has recommended barring candidates with pending criminal cases from contesting elections.
- The Supreme Court in the Lily Thomas case struck down the provision allowing convicted legislators to continue if they appealed within three months.
- Fast-track courts for cases against politicians have been established in all states as per Supreme Court directives.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Explanation: Statements 2 and 3 are correct. The Election Commission has proposed barring candidates with serious criminal charges, and the Lily Thomas case did strike down the provision allowing convicted legislators to continue upon appeal. Statements 1 and 4 are incorrect. The provision allowing convicted persons to contest upon appeal was struck down, and fast-track courts for politicians' cases have not been established in all states as described.
Explanation: Statements 2 and 3 are correct. The Election Commission has proposed barring candidates with serious criminal charges, and the Lily Thomas case did strike down the provision allowing convicted legislators to continue upon appeal. Statements 1 and 4 are incorrect. The provision allowing convicted persons to contest upon appeal was struck down, and fast-track courts for politicians' cases have not been established in all states as described.