With reference to the international legal framework governing strategic waterways, consider the following statements:
- The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides for a "right of transit passage" through straits used for international navigation, which cannot be suspended by bordering states.
- The principle of unrestricted passage through international straits during peacetime was upheld by the International Court of Justice in the Corfu Channel case (UK v. Albania, 1949).
- Under UNCLOS, coastal states bordering an international strait have the sovereign right to impose tolls and environmental clearance fees on all transiting vessels as a condition for passage.
Select the correct code from below:
Explanation – The heart of the matter lies in UNCLOS Articles 37 to 44, which govern "Straits used for International Navigation." These provide that all ships and aircraft enjoy a "right of transit passage" — the freedom of continuous and swift navigation and overflight through international straits. Two phrases are key: transit passage "shall not be impeded" and "there shall be no suspension" of transit passage. The logic is that when a large portion of global trade depends on a narrow corridor, bordering states should not be able to weaponise it.
This principle predates UNCLOS. In the Corfu Channel case (UK v. Albania, 1949), the International Court of Justice held that ships enjoy unrestricted passage through a strait used for international navigation during peacetime, so long as transit does not threaten the coastal state's security. By this standard, Iran's navigation and environmental charges look like an attempt to turn a natural strait into a managed, revenue-generating entry point — administered by Iran with Oman's support.
Explanation – The heart of the matter lies in UNCLOS Articles 37 to 44, which govern "Straits used for International Navigation." These provide that all ships and aircraft enjoy a "right of transit passage" — the freedom of continuous and swift navigation and overflight through international straits. Two phrases are key: transit passage "shall not be impeded" and "there shall be no suspension" of transit passage. The logic is that when a large portion of global trade depends on a narrow corridor, bordering states should not be able to weaponise it.
This principle predates UNCLOS. In the Corfu Channel case (UK v. Albania, 1949), the International Court of Justice held that ships enjoy unrestricted passage through a strait used for international navigation during peacetime, so long as transit does not threaten the coastal state's security. By this standard, Iran's navigation and environmental charges look like an attempt to turn a natural strait into a managed, revenue-generating entry point — administered by Iran with Oman's support.