With reference to the reports of the Gadgil Panel (2011) and the Kasturirangan Panel (2013) on the Western Ghats, consider the following statements -
- Both panels recommended that the entire geographical extent of the Western Ghats be designated as an Ecologically Sensitive Area (ESA).
- The Kasturirangan Panel classified nearly 60% of the Western Ghats as “cultural landscape” and recommended that only the remaining “natural landscape” be notified as ESA.
- The central government formally accepted the Kasturirangan Panel’s recommendations in principle and fully implemented them without any modifications.
Select the correct codes from below
Explanation - The Gadgil Panel (2011) — The Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel, chaired by ecologist Madhav Gadgil, submitted its report in 2011. It took a strict position: the entire 1,29,037 sq km of the Ghats should be designated as ESA, with heavy cross-sectoral restrictions on development activities. States and local communities found this too restrictive and strongly opposed it.
The Kasturirangan Panel (2013) — Given the political resistance to the Gadgil report, the Centre set up a high-level working group under K. Kasturirangan, former chief of ISRO. His panel took a more calibrated approach. The panel identified 1,64,280 sq km as the Ghats' total extent. Of this, it found that 60% was already "cultural landscape" — land under human use: settlements, plantations, and agriculture. The remaining 40% (approximately 60,000 sq km) was classified as "natural landscape" — high biological richness, low human density, and home to national parks, tiger reserves, and elephant habitats. The panel recommended that only this 60,000 sq km natural landscape be notified as ESA, along with a ban on the most damaging industrial activities. The then government accepted this in principle in December 2013.
Explanation - The Gadgil Panel (2011) — The Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel, chaired by ecologist Madhav Gadgil, submitted its report in 2011. It took a strict position: the entire 1,29,037 sq km of the Ghats should be designated as ESA, with heavy cross-sectoral restrictions on development activities. States and local communities found this too restrictive and strongly opposed it.
The Kasturirangan Panel (2013) — Given the political resistance to the Gadgil report, the Centre set up a high-level working group under K. Kasturirangan, former chief of ISRO. His panel took a more calibrated approach. The panel identified 1,64,280 sq km as the Ghats' total extent. Of this, it found that 60% was already "cultural landscape" — land under human use: settlements, plantations, and agriculture. The remaining 40% (approximately 60,000 sq km) was classified as "natural landscape" — high biological richness, low human density, and home to national parks, tiger reserves, and elephant habitats. The panel recommended that only this 60,000 sq km natural landscape be notified as ESA, along with a ban on the most damaging industrial activities. The then government accepted this in principle in December 2013.