Consider the following statements regarding Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) —
- SLAPPs are usually filed by wealthy individuals or corporations to silence critics through prolonged litigation.
- They often target journalists, researchers, NGOs, and other individuals engaged in matters of public interest.
- India has enacted an anti-SLAPP statute similar to those in the USA and Canada.
- The Supreme Court of India has cautioned against the misuse of SLAPP suits in defamation cases.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation – SLAPPs are meritless suits typically filed by influential and wealthy individuals or businesses to drag opponents through protracted litigation and drain their resources. They often target journalists, media, NGOs, academics, researchers, writers, and human rights defenders engaged in public discourse. India has no anti-SLAPP statute, unlike the USA, Canada, and UK which have enacted such laws. However, the Supreme Court of India has warned against 'SLAPP' suits and emphasized protection of journalistic expression in defamation cases, particularly in cases like Bloomberg v. Zee Entertainment and regarding Adani cases
Explanation – SLAPPs are meritless suits typically filed by influential and wealthy individuals or businesses to drag opponents through protracted litigation and drain their resources. They often target journalists, media, NGOs, academics, researchers, writers, and human rights defenders engaged in public discourse. India has no anti-SLAPP statute, unlike the USA, Canada, and UK which have enacted such laws. However, the Supreme Court of India has warned against 'SLAPP' suits and emphasized protection of journalistic expression in defamation cases, particularly in cases like Bloomberg v. Zee Entertainment and regarding Adani cases