Consider the following statements regarding the IUCN World Heritage Outlook -
- It is the only global assessment that evaluates all natural and mixed World Heritage sites on a triennial cycle.
- It categorises sites based on their conservation status, with categories ranging from "good" to "critical."
- Its findings are instrumental in helping stakeholders align their strategies with the goals of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KM-GBF).
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation - The IUCN World Heritage Outlook is the only global assessment that evaluates all natural and mixed World Heritage sites every 3–5 years. It tracks their conservation status, identifies threats, and highlights best management practices to enhance long-term preservation. Implemented by the IUCN World Heritage Team and World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), it provides reliable, transparent, and independent data about the state and prospects of these globally significant natural sites. This initiative supports stakeholders in aligning conservation strategies with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KM-GBF) goals for 2030. It categorises sites as "good," "good with some concerns," "significant concern," and "critical," reflecting their conservation status and urgency of action.
Explanation - The IUCN World Heritage Outlook is the only global assessment that evaluates all natural and mixed World Heritage sites every 3–5 years. It tracks their conservation status, identifies threats, and highlights best management practices to enhance long-term preservation. Implemented by the IUCN World Heritage Team and World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), it provides reliable, transparent, and independent data about the state and prospects of these globally significant natural sites. This initiative supports stakeholders in aligning conservation strategies with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KM-GBF) goals for 2030. It categorises sites as "good," "good with some concerns," "significant concern," and "critical," reflecting their conservation status and urgency of action.