Consider the following statements regarding reservations in India:
1. The Indra Sawhney judgment (1992) prohibits the use of religion as a criterion for granting reservations.
2. The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 allows individuals professing Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism to be considered as Scheduled Castes.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The Indra Sawhney judgment (1992) did not prohibit the use of religion as a criterion for granting reservations. Instead, it clarified that while religion, race, caste, and other group identities were relevant, they could not be the sole criterion for granting reservations
Statement 2 is correct. The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, specifically states that individuals professing religions other than Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism cannot be considered Scheduled Castes, implying that those professing these three religions can be considered as such
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The Indra Sawhney judgment (1992) did not prohibit the use of religion as a criterion for granting reservations. Instead, it clarified that while religion, race, caste, and other group identities were relevant, they could not be the sole criterion for granting reservations
Statement 2 is correct. The Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, specifically states that individuals professing religions other than Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism cannot be considered Scheduled Castes, implying that those professing these three religions can be considered as such