Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct about the ‘ad-hoc judges’ in India?
1. Ad-Hoc judges can be appointed only in the case of High Courts of India and not in the case of Supreme Court of India.
2. An ad-hoc judge of the High Court is deemed to be a judge of the High Court in every sense except he/she does not have an age of retirement.
Select the correct codes from below
Explanation - The appointment of ad-hoc judges was provided for in the Constitution under Article 224A. Under the Article, the Chief Justice of a High Court for any State may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of judge of that court or of any other High Court to sit and act as a judge of the High Court for that State. Such a judge is entitled to such allowances as the president may determine. He will also enjoy all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of a judge of the High Court. But, he will not otherwise be deemed to be a judge of the High Court.
Explanation - The appointment of ad-hoc judges was provided for in the Constitution under Article 224A. Under the Article, the Chief Justice of a High Court for any State may at any time, with the previous consent of the President, request any person who has held the office of judge of that court or of any other High Court to sit and act as a judge of the High Court for that State. Such a judge is entitled to such allowances as the president may determine. He will also enjoy all the jurisdiction, powers and privileges of a judge of the High Court. But, he will not otherwise be deemed to be a judge of the High Court.