With reference to the reports of the Gadgil Panel (2011) and the Kasturirangan Panel (2013) on the Western Ghats, consider the following statements:
- Both panels recommended that the entire geographical extent of the Western Ghats be designated as an Ecologically Sensitive Area (ESA).
- The Kasturirangan Panel classified nearly 60% of the Western Ghats as "cultural landscape" and recommended that only the remaining "natural landscape" be notified as ESA.
- The central government formally accepted the Kasturirangan Panel's recommendations in principle and fully implemented them without any modifications.
Select the correct codes from below:
Explanation –
The Gadgil Panel (2011): The Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel, chaired by ecologist Madhav Gadgil, submitted its report in 2011. It took a strict position: the entire 1,29,037 sq km of the Ghats should be designated as ESA, with heavy cross-sectoral restrictions on development activities. States and local communities found this too restrictive and strongly opposed it.
The Kasturirangan Panel (2013): Given the political resistance to the Gadgil report, the Centre set up a high-level working group under K. Kasturirangan, former chief of ISRO. His panel took a more calibrated approach.
- The panel identified 1,64,280 sq km as the Ghats' total extent.
- Of this, it found that 60% was already "cultural landscape" — land under human use: settlements, plantations, and agriculture.
- The remaining 40% (approximately 60,000 sq km) was classified as "natural landscape" — high biological richness, low human density, and home to national parks, tiger reserves, and elephant habitats.
- The panel recommended that only this 60,000 sq km natural landscape be notified as ESA, along with a ban on the most damaging industrial activities.
- The then government accepted this in principle in December 2013.
Explanation –
The Gadgil Panel (2011): The Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel, chaired by ecologist Madhav Gadgil, submitted its report in 2011. It took a strict position: the entire 1,29,037 sq km of the Ghats should be designated as ESA, with heavy cross-sectoral restrictions on development activities. States and local communities found this too restrictive and strongly opposed it.
The Kasturirangan Panel (2013): Given the political resistance to the Gadgil report, the Centre set up a high-level working group under K. Kasturirangan, former chief of ISRO. His panel took a more calibrated approach.
- The panel identified 1,64,280 sq km as the Ghats' total extent.
- Of this, it found that 60% was already "cultural landscape" — land under human use: settlements, plantations, and agriculture.
- The remaining 40% (approximately 60,000 sq km) was classified as "natural landscape" — high biological richness, low human density, and home to national parks, tiger reserves, and elephant habitats.
- The panel recommended that only this 60,000 sq km natural landscape be notified as ESA, along with a ban on the most damaging industrial activities.
- The then government accepted this in principle in December 2013.